Since reservation_object_fini() does an immediate free, rather than
kfree_rcu as normal, we have to delay the release until after the RCU
grace period has elapsed (i.e. from the rcu cleanup callback) so that we
can rely on the RCU protected access to the fences while the object is a
zombie.
i915_gem_busy_ioctl relies on having an RCU barrier to protect the
reservation in order to avoid having to take a reference and strong
memory barriers.
v2: Order is important; only release after putting the pages!
Fixes: c03467ba40 ("drm/i915/gem: Free pages before rcu-freeing the object")
Testcase: igt/gem_busy/close-race
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190703180601.10950-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we have dropped the final reference to the object, we do not need to
wait until after the rcu grace period to drop its pages. We still require
struct_mutex to completely unbind the object to release the pages, so we
still need a free-worker to manage that from process context. By
scheduling the release of pages before waiting for the rcu should mean
that we are not trapping those pages from beyond the reach of the
shrinker.
v2: Pass along the request to skip if the vma is busy to the underlying
unbind routine, to avoid checking the reservation underneath the
i915->mm.obj_lock which may be used from inside irq context.
v3: Flip the bit for unbinding while active, for later convenience.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111035
Fixes: a93615f900 ("drm/i915: Throw away the active object retirement complexity")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190703091726.11690-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
