Peter Zijlstra d5b0e0677b u64_stats,lockdep: Fix u64_stats_init() vs lockdep ...

Jakub reported that:

    static struct net_device *rtl8139_init_board(struct pci_dev *pdev)
    {
	    ...
	    u64_stats_init(&tp->rx_stats.syncp);
	    u64_stats_init(&tp->tx_stats.syncp);
	    ...
    }

results in lockdep getting confused between the RX and TX stats lock.
This is because u64_stats_init() is an inline calling seqcount_init(),
which is a macro using a static variable to generate a lockdep class.

By wrapping that in an inline, we negate the effect of the macro and
fold the static key variable, hence the confusion.

Fix by also making u64_stats_init() a macro for the case where it
matters, leaving the other case an inline for argument validation
etc.

Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Debugged-by: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: "Erhard F." <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YEXicy6+9MksdLZh@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

2021-03-10 09:51:45 +01:00

5.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw